Compliance tells you what the standard says. Risk tells you where people actually get hurt.
Most audits focus on whether paperwork exists.
We focus on whether people are exposed.
Our Risk & Exposure Reviews use OSHA standards as guardrails, not blinders.
We identify where real work, real behavior, and real conditions create exposure — then map those risks back to the applicable OSHA requirements.
The result is not a checklist.
It’s a clear picture of where injuries, citations, and operational failures are most likely to occur — before OSHA ever shows up.
Not a checklist. Not a clipboard walk-through.
We identify physical, operational, and behavioral hazards tied to actual tasks—including where exposure increases due to layout, equipment, traffic flow, fatigue, or shortcuts
Once risks are identified, we map them to applicable OSHA standards to highlight gaps between real conditions and regulatory expectations—without forcing one-size-fits-all fixes.
Findings are prioritized based on severity and likelihood—not volume. You’ll know which issues create real injury risk versus those that are administrative or cosmetic.
Clear findings. Defensible documentation. Actionable priorities.
A prioritized summary of hazards and exposures based on severity and likelihood — not just visibility.
OSHA-referenced observations
Findings aligned to applicable OSHA standards to support compliance conversations and audits without turning the review into citations.
Operational gap analysis
Identification of process, workflow, supervision, and training gaps that increase exposure in real work conditions.
Leadership-ready summary
A concise report that can be shared with leadership, insurers, or legal counsel to demonstrate due diligence and informed decision-making.
Clear next-step recommendations
Practical options to reduce exposure — with decisions remaining in your control.
You’ve never had a true mock OSHA audit
Recent incidents or near-misses raised concerns
Growth, turnover, or operational changes increased exposure
Leadership wants visibility into real risk—not assumptions
Insurance carriers or clients are asking harder questions
If your goal is simply to “check the box,” this may not be the right approach.
If your goal is to understand exposure and reduce real risk, it usually is.